Retraining ReportJob training public funding can pay for

Find training

Job training programs in the District of Columbia

22 programs in 14 fields, with costs, results and funding that can make them free

3 schools offer these programs, and every one is approved for workforce funding. Compare the fields below, then open one to see each program with its price and how past students did.

Online programs in the District of Columbia · Programs of 12 weeks or less

Job training in the District of Columbia by line of work

Each line of work compares its fields in the District of Columbia. A line gets a page once two of its fields have one here.

Compare job training in the District of Columbia: cost, pay and results

Job training in the District of Columbia, by field
TrainingProgramsMost costEarned a year, estimatedWorking 6 months laterFinished
IT training6$2,962 to $4,935Not enough dataNot enough dataNot enough data
Construction training programs3Too few figures to show
Home health aide training2Too few figures to show
CDL training1Too few figures to show
Medical assistant training1Too few figures to show
Medical billing and coding training1Too few figures to show
Pharmacy technician training1Too few figures to show
Cybersecurity training1Too few figures to show
Project management certification1Too few figures to show
Paralegal programs1Too few figures to show
Medical administrative assistant training1Too few figures to show
Administrative assistant training1Too few figures to show
Health information technology programs1Too few figures to show
Customer service training1Too few figures to show

Each figure is the middle program of that field. Yearly earnings are the reported quarter times four, an estimate.Source: US Department of Labor, program year 2024 (July 2024 to June 2025). Only programs approved for workforce funding are counted; other schools in the District of Columbia may offer more. How these figures are made

Is there free job training in the District of Columbia?

Where the District of Columbia job training numbers come from

Which the District of Columbia programs are counted?

Programs the District of Columbia approved for WIOA funding (public workforce funding under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act). Each state keeps its approved programs on an eligible training provider list (ETPL).5 They come from the US Department of Labor's file for program year 2024 (July 2024 to June 2025), covering programs approved as of June 30, 2025. Schools that never applied for approval are missing, so this is a part of what the District of Columbia offers.

What the figures for each field mean

Each figure is the middle program among those that report it: half did better, half did worse. Prices are what most programs cost if you pay yourself (the middle half). Earnings are for the second quarter after students left, times four. Where a figure is missing, the table says why: "Not reported", "Left out" or "Not enough data" (what each means).

How reliable are the District of Columbia figures?

The US Department of Labor's own results site lists the District of Columbia among the states with "known data quality concerns".6 The figures here are shown as the state reported them; check them with the school before you enroll.

Sources for the funding facts about job training in the District of Columbia

Show the 6 sourcesHide the sources
  1. US Department of Labor, TrainingProviderResults.gov: About This Site
  2. US Department of Labor: WIOA Adult Program
  3. Code of Federal Regulations, title 20, part 680, sections 680.220, 680.230 and 680.310: career services before training, other grants such as Pell Grants first, and limits on Individual Training Accounts (GovInfo, 2024 edition)
  4. US Department of Labor: American Job Centers
  5. US Department of Labor, Training and Employment Guidance Letter 8-19, Attachment I: Requirements for Training Providers, Program Eligibility, and the State Eligible Training Provider (ETP) List
  6. US Department of Labor, TrainingProviderResults.gov: search page, note on states with known data quality concerns